Blog EN

How much does AI consulting cost in 2026? Day rates, fixed prices and what drives the bill

Offer document with a price tag and a clock, showing a fixed price and a ten working day timeline for an AI readiness audit
Antonina14 September 20269 min read
Quoted day rates for AI work in the UK cluster around GBP 560, with the middle half of the market between GBP 463 and GBP 675 (IT Jobs Watch, 3,171 rates quoted in the six months to 14 September 2026). Firms charge more than contractors. A fixed-price readiness audit is the one line item you can compare across vendors.
In short
  • Median UK contractor day rate for AI skills: GBP 560. Quartiles: GBP 463 and GBP 675, with the top decile at GBP 788.
  • Most "AI consulting cost" ranges published online come from consultancies' own blogs, with no method, sample or date. Treat them as positioning.
  • Companies plan to spend 1.7 % of revenue on AI in 2026, up from 0.8 % in 2025 (BCG AI Radar 2026, 2,360 executives).
  • The bill is driven by the state of your data, the number of decision makers in the room and the size of the first step, not by the model you pick.
  • Our AI readiness audit is 1 400 EUR net, ten working days, fixed scope, with a written list of things not worth building.

What the market actually quotes

The most checkable price signal in this market is not a consultancy's rate card. It is what employers write in job ads when they need the same skills for a few months. IT Jobs Watch reads those ads and publishes the distribution.

Contractor day rates quoted in UK job ads requiring AI skills, six months to 14.09.2026, 3,171 quoted rates · IT Jobs Watch
PercentileDay rateWhat it usually means
10thGBP 400junior or narrowly scoped work
25thGBP 463routine delivery inside an existing team
MedianGBP 560experienced individual contributor
75thGBP 675scarce skills, regulated or high-risk context
90thGBP 788specialist scarcity, short notice, or both

Read that as a floor for firm pricing, not as the price of a firm. A consultancy quoting a day rate is also selling delivery management, cover when someone is ill, and the risk that the work takes longer than planned. What it should not be selling is the privilege of a logo.

Why most published price ranges are useless

Search for the cost of AI consulting and you will find tidy tables: solo experts at one band, boutiques at another, large firms at a third. Almost none of them say who was surveyed, how many, or when. They are written by the same consultancies whose prices they describe.

Three questions separate a number you can use from a number someone made up. Who was counted? How many? On what date? A range that cannot answer all three belongs in a pitch deck, not in your budget.

This is why the table above cites a sample size and a date, and why the only price we quote for our own work is the one on our price list.

What the numbers say
80.3 %of enterprise AI projects fail to deliver the value promised, with a third abandoned before they reach production. The money is lost on projects, not on rates.Source: RAND Corporation, research on enterprise AI project failure, 2025
88 % / 37 %of companies use AI in at least one function, but only this share report a positive effect on operating profit. Adoption is cheap; results are not.Source: McKinsey, "The State of AI", 2026
1.7 %of revenue is what companies plan to spend on AI in 2026, more than double the 0.8 % of 2025. Financial and technology firms sit near 2 %, industrial and real estate below 1 %.Source: BCG, "AI Radar 2026", survey of 2,360 executives in 16 markets, January 2026

Fixed price or time and materials

Both are honest. They answer different questions.

  • Fixed price fits a decision. An assessment, an audit, a roadmap: the work has a defined end and a written deliverable, so the price can be written down before it starts. You can put two offers side by side and compare them.
  • Time and materials fits a build. Modelling on data nobody has profiled yet changes shape as you learn. A fixed price here is either padded for risk or renegotiated later, and both outcomes cost you more than paying for the days you use.

The practical rule: fix the price of the first step, then decide about the build once you know what the data allows. A vendor who refuses to fix the price of a two-week assessment is telling you something about how they scope work.

AI readiness audit, 1 400 EUR net, ten working days Fixed scope and fixed price. You get a process map, an assessment of your data, three recommendations with cost and time estimates, and a written list of things not worth building. Book a 30-minute intro call

What a readiness audit costs and what it contains

Our own number, because we publish it: 1 400 EUR net, ten working days from the first interview, one payment, no retainer and no obligation to buy anything afterwards.

The sequence is fixed: a 90-minute interview with the person who owns the decision, up to three 45-minute interviews with the people who actually run the processes, five working days of analysis, then a 60-minute session to walk through the report.

Decision owner90 min The team3 x 45 min Analysis5 working days Report60 min session ten working days end to end, price fixed before the first call
What the fixed price buys. The schedule is part of the offer, not an estimate.

The report contains a process map with an automation score, an assessment of whether your data can carry the use cases you have in mind, an impact-versus-effort matrix, three recommendations with cost and time estimates, the competence gaps in your team, and the list of things we would not build in your situation and why.

That last section is the one clients quote back to us. It is also the reason the price can be fixed: we are selling a decision, not a build.

What really drives the bill

  1. The state of your data. Gartner expects most organisations to abandon AI projects that are not supported by AI-ready data. Profiling, cleaning and joining data is where the hours go, long before anyone trains a model.
  2. How many people have to agree. Each additional decision maker adds workshops, revisions and waiting time. Two people who can say yes will always be cheaper than six who can only say maybe.
  3. The size of the first step. A month of discovery before any code is a cost that produces slides. A two-week assessment that ends in a decision is a cost that produces a direction.
  4. Compliance context. Regulated processes need documentation, traceability and review, and that is real work, not padding.
  5. Who does the work. A named senior person on the account costs more per day and less per project than a rotating team you meet after signing.
From practiceIn the engagements we run, the single most expensive surprise is not the model. It is discovering in week three that the data needed for the promised use case is not collected at all, or is collected in a form nobody can join to anything else. That is exactly what a readiness audit is for: finding it in week one, for a known price.

How much budget is normal

BCG's 2026 survey of 2,360 executives across 16 markets found companies planning to spend an average of 1.7 % of revenue on AI, more than double the 0.8 % of 2025. Financial institutions and technology companies sit near 2 %, industrial and real estate companies below 1 %.

Use it as a sanity check, not a target. Our own arithmetic on the BCG figure: for a company with 20 million EUR in revenue, 1.7 % is 340 000 EUR a year across tools, people and outside help. Against that, a fixed-price assessment is a rounding error, and it decides where the rest goes.

When not to hire a consultant at all
  • You already know what to build, you have the data, and you have the people. Then you need capacity, not advice.
  • Nobody internally owns the outcome. External work cannot create a decision maker.
  • There is no budget for what comes after the assessment. A report you cannot act on is an expensive document.
  • The team cannot give you three 45-minute interviews. Without them, any assessment is guesswork with a logo on it.
  • You want a supplier to guarantee a return before seeing your data. Nobody honest can do that, and the promise itself is a warning sign.

Frequently asked questions

What is a typical day rate for an AI consultant?
In the UK, the median quoted contractor day rate for roles requiring AI skills is GBP 560, based on 3,171 rates quoted in job ads over the six months to 14 September 2026 (IT Jobs Watch). A quarter of roles quote GBP 463 or less, a quarter quote GBP 675 or more. Firm rates sit higher than contractor rates because they include delivery management and risk.
Is fixed price or time and materials better for an AI project?
Fixed price works when the scope is a decision, not a build: an assessment, an audit, a roadmap. Time and materials fits work whose shape changes as you learn, such as modelling on data nobody has profiled yet. The practical rule is to fix the price of the first step so you can compare offers, then decide about the build once you know what the data allows.
Why do published AI consulting price ranges differ so much?
Most ranges you find come from consultancies' own marketing pages with no stated method, no sample and no date. They are positioning, not data. Figures you can check come from job ad aggregators, marketplace rate cards and published fee schedules, and even those measure different things: a contractor rate is not a firm rate, and neither is a project price.
How much should a first AI engagement cost?
Small enough that a wrong answer is survivable. Companies now plan to spend an average of 1.7 percent of revenue on AI in 2026, more than double the 0.8 percent of 2025 (BCG AI Radar 2026, 2,360 executives). A first engagement that eats a large share of that before anyone has looked at your data is a risk, not a strategy.
Thirty minutes, no slides Tell us what you are trying to decide. If an audit is not the right next step for you, we will say so on the call. Pick a time
Antonina
Antonina
Research Analyst, Akademia Data Science